So we may get Nuri Sahin on loan. But there is a chance that Real Madrid would sell him, as they have said Real's is a hard team to be in, with all the quality players they have. Especially as Sahin has spent time on the injury list. So the question that can be asked, should we sign him on a permanent basis?
He must be a good player (in Wenger's eyes) if we are looking to bring him in, so could it hurt to sign him permanently? Surely he would still get more playing time at Arsenal than he would at Real Madrid, even if he wasn't always a starter for the team. He could also add to Arsenal as an impact sub as well as first team chances. Am I wrong? Or should we just try to sign him on a loan basis. I have seen a few videos of him on youtube and he looks a good player. However the question is, is he good enough for Arsenal?. So come on readers.... debate... debate... I think he looks good.
So here are the questions for the debate
1. Should we bring in Nuri Sahin on a permenent deal?
2. With the incoming of Cazorla and additions of Giroud and Podolski, what do you think Arsenal's chances of having an excellent season?
thanks and please lets discuss this.
I would like to converse more with gunners. All us Arsenal fans who share the same passion. Or even if your a Chelsea fan who cares discuss (but only nice things or respectible criticsm please)
Thank you
